AI Gateway

Tracking LLM Token Usage Across Providers, Teams, and Workloads

Tracking LLM Token Usage Across Providers, Teams, and Workloads

Every interaction with a large language model costs money. Tokens are how providers meter capacity, and they sit at the intersection of pricing, latency, and efficiency. Most teams understand this in isolation. What becomes significantly harder is tracking token usage across a growing landscape of workloads, teams, and providers.

When costs spike, organizations struggle to determine whether traffic increased, an agent entered a recursive loop, or a verbose prompt made it to production. When budgets need to be allocated across departments, finance teams discover there is no attribution layer connecting LLM spend to the teams generating it. And when multiple providers are in the mix, reconciling mismatched token accounting methods across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Bedrock becomes a manual, error-prone process.

This guide outlines a practical framework for making LLM token usage traceable and governable, and explains how Bifrost solves this at the infrastructure layer so platform teams can understand where tokens go, who consumes them, and how to control it.

Why Token Tracking Matters at Scale

Token-based pricing creates a fundamentally different cost model than traditional API services. Unlike predictable per-call pricing, LLM costs depend on input tokens, output tokens, model selection, and increasingly, reasoning tokens that are invisible without proper instrumentation. At scale, several problems compound:

  • Silent cost escalation: Verbose prompts, redundant API calls, and unoptimized context windows drain budgets without triggering any alerts. A single unoptimized prompt chain can multiply expenses by 10x
  • No cost attribution: When multiple teams share LLM infrastructure, there is no way to determine which team, feature, or workload is responsible for what percentage of the bill
  • Provider fragmentation: Organizations using multiple providers receive separate billing dashboards with different token counting methods, making cross-provider analysis nearly impossible
  • Delayed incident response: Provider billing data arrives with delays of hours or days. Teams discover runaway costs from misconfigured agents or infinite loops only when monthly invoices arrive
  • Hidden token types: Modern reasoning models like OpenAI's o-series generate internal reasoning tokens that count toward output costs but are not visible in the final response. Without instrumentation, these costs are invisible

Without a centralized tracking layer, LLM spending remains a black box. The goal is to turn token usage from something that happens to organizations into something they can measure, attribute, and control.

The Four Layers of Production Token Tracking

Effective token tracking requires four interconnected capabilities working together:

1. Centralized Metering Across Providers

Every LLM request, regardless of provider, needs to flow through a single metering layer that counts tokens independently and normalizes them into a consistent format. This eliminates the problem of reconciling different accounting methods across OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, and others.

  • Token counts should be captured at the gateway level, not reconstructed from provider billing
  • Input tokens, output tokens, cached tokens, and reasoning tokens should all be tracked separately
  • Costs should be calculated in real time based on current provider pricing, not estimated after the fact

2. Granular Attribution and Tagging

Raw token counts are useless without context. Every request needs to carry metadata that answers the fundamental attribution questions:

  • Team level: How much is the marketing team spending on content generation versus the engineering team on code assistance?
  • Workload level: What percentage of tokens goes to customer-facing chatbots versus internal tooling versus batch processing?
  • Environment level: Are production costs aligned with staging costs, or is a development workload consuming disproportionate resources?
  • Model level: Which models are most cost-effective for different task types?

Attribution should be automatic. Requiring developers to manually tag every request does not scale. The infrastructure layer should associate requests with teams and workloads based on API keys, virtual keys, or routing configuration.

3. Budget Enforcement and Rate Limiting

Visibility without consequences does not change behavior. The tracking framework needs to support usage caps, rate limits, and budget thresholds that can apply per team, per workload, or per model. Enforcement should be automated. Exceeding budgets should not require manual intervention - the system should automatically throttle or block requests when limits are reached.

  • Hard limits: Requests are blocked when a team or project exceeds its allocated budget
  • Soft limits: Alerts fire when usage approaches thresholds, giving teams time to investigate before hitting caps
  • Rate limiting: Request throughput is controlled per team, per application, or per API key to prevent any single consumer from monopolizing shared infrastructure

4. Real-Time Dashboards and Alerting

The data needs to surface somewhere actionable. Dashboards that track spend over time, rank workloads by consumption, highlight anomalies, and compare model efficiency help teams see patterns and course-correct before costs spiral.

  • Cost anomaly detection should trigger alerts within minutes, not days
  • Per-team and per-workload breakdowns should be available without custom queries
  • Model comparison views should show cost-per-output-quality ratios to inform routing decisions

How Bifrost Solves Token Tracking at the Gateway Layer

Bifrost is a high-performance, open-source AI gateway written in Go that makes token tracking a byproduct of how teams access models. Instead of applications calling each provider directly, Bifrost sits in the middle as the access layer. This gives platform teams a single entry point to observe traffic, enforce policy, and standardize token behavior, even if applications are distributed, built in different stacks, or talking to multiple model vendors.

Unified multi-provider metering:

  • Bifrost provides a single OpenAI-compatible API across 12+ providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, Azure, Mistral, Groq, and more
  • Because every request flows through Bifrost, token counts are captured consistently regardless of which provider handles the request
  • Native Prometheus metrics export token consumption, latency distributions, error rates, and cache hit rates into existing monitoring stacks

Hierarchical budget management:

  • Bifrost's governance features provide hierarchical cost controls through virtual keys at the organization, team, customer, and project level
  • Hard budget limits prevent overruns automatically. When a team hits its allocation, requests are throttled or blocked without requiring manual intervention
  • Real-time usage tracking gives finance and platform teams immediate visibility into which teams are consuming what, enabling both showback and chargeback models

Automatic attribution without developer overhead:

  • Virtual keys act as the attribution layer. Each team, project, or workload gets its own key, and all usage is automatically tracked against it
  • No manual tagging required. The gateway handles attribution based on which key is used for each request
  • Per-key analytics break down prompt tokens, completion tokens, cached tokens, and total spend

Cost optimization built into the gateway:

  • Semantic caching reduces token consumption by caching responses based on meaning rather than exact text. Semantically similar queries hit the cache, cutting repeat API costs significantly
  • Automatic fallbacks route requests to alternative providers when a primary is rate-limited or unavailable, preventing both downtime and cost spikes from retry storms
  • Load balancing distributes requests across multiple API keys and providers to avoid rate limit walls and optimize throughput

Enterprise security:

  • HashiCorp Vault integration provides secure API key management for enterprise environments
  • SSO support with Google and GitHub authentication for team access control
  • Comprehensive audit trails log every request with metadata for compliance

Performance:

  • Under sustained traffic at 5,000 requests per second, Bifrost adds roughly 11 microseconds of gateway overhead. Python-based proxies typically add hundreds of microseconds to milliseconds once concurrency climbs. For agent workflows where a single user action triggers multiple LLM calls, that performance gap compounds rapidly

Deployment:

Connecting Token Tracking to Quality Monitoring

Reducing token spend only matters if output quality holds. A cheaper model or a cache hit is only valuable if the response is reliable. This is where Bifrost's native integration with Maxim AI's observability suite closes the loop.

Gateway cost and performance data flows directly into Maxim's dashboards, giving teams a unified view of spend and output quality in one place. Teams can:

  • Monitor cost trends alongside quality metrics like accuracy, hallucination rate, and task completion
  • Run automated evaluations on gateway traffic using custom evaluators, LLM-as-a-judge metrics, and deterministic rules
  • Catch regressions before they affect users by correlating cost changes with quality changes
  • Curate production data into evaluation datasets for continuous improvement

Best Practices for Token Tracking Implementation

Regardless of tooling, these practices help teams build effective token tracking:

  • Start tracking from day one: Instrument during prototyping so you understand baseline model behavior. Early tracking catches expensive patterns before they become architectural assumptions
  • Track cached and reasoning tokens separately: Semantic caching reduces costs, but understanding cache hit rates requires tracking both raw and cached token counts. Reasoning tokens from o-series models count toward cost but are invisible without instrumentation
  • Use showback before chargeback: Start by showing teams their usage data before enforcing budget limits. Visibility alone changes behavior in most cases
  • Set budget alerts at 70% and 90% thresholds: Give teams warning before they hit hard limits so they can investigate and adjust
  • Compare cost-per-quality across models: The cheapest model is not always the most cost-effective. Track cost alongside output quality metrics to make informed routing decisions

Conclusion

LLM token usage tracking is not a reporting exercise. It is the foundation for cost governance, budget accountability, and operational control over AI infrastructure. Without centralized metering, granular attribution, automated enforcement, and real-time visibility, organizations are flying blind on one of their fastest-growing infrastructure costs.

Bifrost delivers all four layers in a single high-performance gateway with 11 microsecond overhead, hierarchical budget controls, and native integration with production quality monitoring.

Ready to take control of your LLM token usage? Book a demo to see how Bifrost gives platform teams complete visibility and governance over token consumption across every provider, team, and workload.

Read next