Top 5 AI Agent Frameworks in 2025: A Practical Guide for AI Builders

AI agents have moved from demos to dependable systems that book meetings, triage tickets, analyze contracts, and orchestrate complex workflows. With this shift, teams need frameworks that balance speed with reliability, tooling with observability, and developer ergonomics with enterprise readiness.
This guide breaks down the top five AI agent frameworks in 2025, how they differ, where each shines, and how to wire them into a production setup with proper evaluation and observability. Throughout, you will find contextual links to documentation, examples, and playbooks that help you go from prototype to production fast. If you want a platform that helps you experiment, evaluate, simulate, and observe agents end to end, see Maxim’s Platform Overview and product pillars for Experimentation, Agent Simulation and Evaluation, and Agent Observability.
Meta Description: Compare the top AI agent frameworks of 2025 — LangGraph, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LlamaIndex, and AutoGen — plus a production blueprint for evaluation and observability with Maxim.
Selection Criteria
We evaluated frameworks using the following criteria to ensure practical fit for production:
- Maturity and ecosystem support
- Clarity of abstraction for tool use, memory, and multi-agent coordination
- Developer experience and documentation depth
- Production readiness, evaluation hooks, and integration surface area for observability
- Flexibility for single-agent and multi-agent patterns
- Alignment with enterprise needs such as security and scalability
For an end-to-end blueprint of what to measure and how, see Maxim’s core blogs on AI Agent Quality Evaluation, AI Agent Evaluation Metrics, and Evaluation Workflows for AI Agents. Also see guidance on Session-Level vs Node-Level Metrics and LLM Observability Best Practices.
The Shortlist
- LangGraph by LangChain: Graph state machine for controllable, branching workflows
- CrewAI: Role and task centric multi-agent collaboration
- OpenAI Agents: Managed runtime with first-party tools and memory patterns
- LlamaIndex Agents: RAG-first agent capabilities over enterprise data
- Microsoft AutoGen: Flexible multi-agent conversation patterns and human-in-the-loop
No single framework is universally best. The right choice depends on your application’s requirements, your team’s skill set, and your production architecture. Regardless of choice, incorporate evaluation and monitoring from the start.
LangGraph by LangChain
- Official docs: See LangChain Introduction and the LangGraph sections and tutorials linked from there.
- Platform: Learn more about the LangGraph Platform for deployment and management.
What It Is
LangGraph brings graph-first thinking to agentic workflows. Instead of monolithic chains, you define a state machine with nodes, edges, and conditional routing. This yields traceable, debuggable flows that suit complex, multi-step reasoning and tool orchestration.
Why Teams Choose It
- Declarative graph execution model with clear state and transitions
- Rich ecosystem of tools and retrievers via LangChain
- Good fit for multi-turn flows, branching logic, and recovery paths
Typical Use Cases
- Customer support agents with policy checks and escalation paths
- Research pipelines that branch based on intermediate scores
- Agents that combine search, RAG, function calls, and validators
Production Considerations
State management is explicit, which aids debugging and testing. You will want granular tracing and span-level metrics for each node. Use a dedicated observability layer to capture token usage, latency, and quality signals at node and session level. Maxim’s Tracing Overview and Online Evaluations map directly onto a LangGraph setup. Use Alerts and Notifications for guardrail enforcement.
How To Integrate With Maxim
- Instrument your graph to emit spans for each node, including model calls and tool calls
- Run Online Evaluations periodically on live traffic to detect regressions in response quality, faithfulness, and bias
- Use Simulations to stress-test edge cases before release
Related Reading
CrewAI
- Official docs: CrewAI Documentation
- Overview site: CrewAI Platform
What It Is
CrewAI emphasizes multi-agent coordination through roles, tasks, and collaboration protocols. You model crews of specialized agents that cooperate asynchronously or in rounds to accomplish goals. It lowers the coordination overhead while letting you inject domain-specific roles and standard operating procedures.
Why Teams Choose It
- Intuitive abstraction for multi-agent collaboration
- Role and task centric modeling that matches real-world teams
- Suitable for creative and research workflows where diverse perspectives matter
Typical Use Cases
- Content generation workflows requiring editor, fact-checker, and SEO roles
- Due diligence pipelines where one agent extracts data and another validates
- Product research agents combining market scanning and competitive analysis
Production Considerations
Multi-agent systems amplify complexity. You need to watch for loops, tool misuse, and cost blowups. Use continuous monitoring for cost, latency, and quality. In practice, teams route CrewAI runs through live evaluation pipelines, sampling logs to check for hallucination, off-topic behavior, and missed requirements. See Agent Observability and the Library Overview to turn production logs into datasets.
How To Integrate With Maxim
- Log each agent’s messages and tool calls as spans
- Attach evaluator scores to sessions and nodes for trend tracking
- Build targeted alerts for spike conditions such as excessive tool calls or low faithfulness using Alerts
Related Reading
OpenAI Agents
- Official docs: OpenAI Agents Guide
- SDK reference: OpenAI Agents SDK
What It Is
OpenAI Agents provide a managed agent runtime that simplifies tool invocation, retrieval, and function calling within a tightly integrated environment. If you are already standardized on OpenAI’s platform, this can be a fast route to pilot agent features without building orchestration from scratch.
Why Teams Choose It
- Tightly integrated developer experience for OpenAI models
- Simple interface for tool registration and invocation
- Alignment with platform features such as vector stores and structured outputs
Typical Use Cases
- Support assistants that combine RAG, function calls, and a few critical tools
- Sales or scheduling assistants backed by organization-specific tools
- Lightweight internal copilots that benefit from the managed runtime
Production Considerations
The tradeoff for simplicity is reduced portability compared to open frameworks. Plan abstractions if you foresee multi-model strategies. Ensure observability at the span and tool level. Managed runtimes can obscure details unless you explicitly capture traces and evaluations in your app layer. Pair with an observability platform that supports distributed tracing across traditional services and LLM calls. See Agent Observability for visual trace views and OTel compatibility.
How To Integrate With Maxim
- Wrap agent calls to emit traces with metadata such as user ID, scenario, and persona
- Enable Online Evaluations on sampled sessions to monitor drift
- Export data via CSV or APIs for audits and post-mortems using Exports
Related Reading
- Online vs Offline Evals: Online Evaluations and Offline Evaluations
- Observability-Driven Development
LlamaIndex Agents
- Framework and docs: LlamaIndex Framework
What It Is
LlamaIndex is a pragmatic toolkit for RAG with agent capabilities that route queries, select tools, and plan multi-step retrieval workflows. It shines when your agent needs grounded retrieval over heterogeneous data sources with careful control over indexing and context windows.
Why Teams Choose It
- Strong data connectors and indexing strategies
- Clear primitives for query engines, retrievers, and tools
- Solid default patterns for reducing hallucinations via grounded retrieval
Typical Use Cases
- Contract analysis agents that stitch together private repositories, cloud drives, and databases
- Enterprise search assistants that must stay factual and traceable
- Domain copilots that need rigorous citations and evidence trails
Production Considerations
Your quality bar hinges on retrieval quality and response faithfulness. Bake in systematic evaluations for context relevance, answer correctness, and citation coverage. Use automatic metrics alongside human review for last mile correctness. Maxim’s unified evaluation framework supports both AI and human evaluators, as well as custom logic for tool and context aware grading. See the Library Overview and Agent Simulation and Evaluation.
How To Integrate With Maxim
- Capture per step retrieval diagnostics in traces, including source IDs and token counts
- Run scheduled test suites for key tasks, then compare evaluation runs across versions with the Test Runs Comparison Dashboard
- Curate datasets continuously from production logs using Context Sources
Related Reading
Microsoft AutoGen
- Official site and docs: AutoGen 0.2 and Getting Started
What It Is
AutoGen provides a flexible substrate for building multi-agent systems that can converse, plan, and use tools collaboratively. It offers structured conversation patterns, programmable agent profiles, and handoff control that is attractive for iterative problem solving. The project continues to evolve; check the site for the latest version and migration guidance.
Why Teams Choose It
- Rich set of conversation and coordination patterns
- Supports human-in-the-loop steps out of the box
- Good for complex reasoning and stepwise decomposition
Typical Use Cases
- Scientific or analytical pipelines where incremental verification matters
- Coding or data wrangling assistants where human approval gates are required
- Enterprise workflows that need explicit control over agent collaboration and escalation
Production Considerations
Conversation loops and runaway costs can occur without safeguards. Enforce strict policies on step counts, tool call budgets, and retry behavior, and combine with alerts for anomalies. Instrument at a granular level to understand where time and tokens are spent, and feed insights into test suites. Maxim’s real-time alerts and enterprise controls help enforce guardrails at scale. See Alerts and Notifications and Pricing for RBAC and enterprise options.
How To Integrate With Maxim
- Emit trace spans for each agent turn and tool call, with structured metadata for scenario and persona
- Attach online evaluator scores to turns for drift detection
- Use Agent Simulation and Evaluation to run thousands of scenarios in CI and promote only passing versions
Related Reading
Feature Comparison At A Glance
Framework | Best For | Coordination Model | Tooling Ecosystem | Learning Curve | Production Fit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LangGraph | Complex, branching workflows | Graph state machine | Extensive via LangChain | Moderate | Strong with tracing and tests |
CrewAI | Multi-agent collaboration via roles | Role and task orchestration | Growing, community-led | Low to moderate | Strong with policy and cost controls |
OpenAI Agents | Fastest path on OpenAI stack | Managed runtime | First-party OpenAI tools | Low | Strong, with portability tradeoffs |
LlamaIndex Agents | RAG-heavy agents with citations | Router and tool-based | Deep connectors, retrievers | Moderate | Strong with faithfulness evals |
AutoGen | Advanced multi-agent reasoning | Conversation patterns and handoffs | Flexible, research-friendly | Moderate to high | Strong with loop and budget guards |
How To Choose The Right Agent Framework
- Start From Tasks, Not Tech
List the top tasks your agent must perform and the non-functional constraints. Are you optimizing for latency under SLAs, or for correctness in long-horizon reasoning? If correctness is paramount and multi-step retrieval is involved, LlamaIndex may be a better base. If you have branching business logic, LangGraph tends to be more tractable. - Decide Single Agent vs Multi-Agent Early
If your workflow is truly multi-role, choose CrewAI or AutoGen to avoid shoehorning. If it is mostly a single agent calling tools, OpenAI Agents or LangGraph often lead to simpler, more predictable deployments. - Plan For Production Maturity From Day One
Regardless of framework, you will need evaluation suites, observability, alerts, and a path to human review. Adopt an observability-driven development approach. Set up a closed loop that moves data from production logs into curated datasets for future evals. References: Observability-Driven Development and Library Overview. - Avoid Sharp Edges With Clear Guardrails
- Token and step budgets per session
- Explicit tool whitelists and timeouts
- Prompt versioning and A/B testing in production
Maxim’s Experimentation supports prompt versioning and in-production A/B testing to operationalize these practices.
A Production Blueprint That Works With Any Framework
Use this setup regardless of your chosen framework.
- Develop And Version Prompts Centrally
Use a Prompt IDE and compare outputs across models, parameters, and tool configurations. Deploy prompts with tags and variables to decouple app code from prompt changes. See Experimentation. - Build A Test Suite Before Launch
Create offline evaluation datasets that reflect real scenarios, edge cases, and failure modes. Use AI evaluators for speed and human evaluation for high stakes tasks. Learn more: Offline Evaluations and Human Evaluation Support. - Simulate Realistic Conversations
Simulate multi-turn interactions across personas and contexts to measure robustness before shipping. Tie simulations into CI so nothing goes live without passing gates. See Simulations Overview. - Instrument With Distributed Tracing
Log each span at the tool, model, and node level. Capture request and response metadata, token counts, latencies, and evaluator scores. See the Tracing Quickstart. - Monitor Quality In Production
Run Online Evaluations on sampled live traffic to measure drift. Alert on drops in faithfulness, spikes in latency, or cost anomalies. See Online Evaluations and Alerts and Notifications. - Close The Loop With Data Curation
Promote tricky production examples into datasets for future regression tests. Build dashboards to track version over version improvements. See the Library Overview and the Test Runs Comparison Dashboard. - Prepare For Enterprise Requirements
If you operate in regulated environments, prioritize security posture and deployment options. Maxim supports in-VPC deployment, RBAC, SSO, and SOC 2 Type 2. See Agent Observability and Pricing.
Example: Minimal Pseudocode For Tracing And Online Evaluations
# Pseudocode illustrating instrumentation with Maxim SDK concepts
with maxim.trace(session_id, user_id, scenario="support_triage") as trace:
span = trace.start_span("node:policy_check", metadata={"persona": "enterprise_user"})
result = agent.invoke(input, tools=tools)
span.end(metadata={
"latency_ms": result.latency_ms,
"tokens_in": result.tokens_in,
"tokens_out": result.tokens_out,
"tool_calls": result.tool_calls
})
# Sample an online evaluation on a subset of sessions (configured in Maxim)
maxim.evals.schedule_online(
filter={"app": "support_triage", "persona": "enterprise_user"},
metrics=["faithfulness", "task_success", "toxicity"],
sampling_rate=0.1
)
Practical Examples Mapped To Frameworks
- Customer Support Triage With Policy Checks
- Preferred frameworks: LangGraph for clear routing and guardrails, OpenAI Agents for velocity on the OpenAI stack
- Production add-ons: Online Evaluations for policy compliance and faithfulness, plus alerts on user dissatisfaction signals
- Research Copilot For Competitive Analysis
- Preferred frameworks: CrewAI for multi-role collaboration and AutoGen for iterative reasoning with human approval gates
- Production add-ons: Cost and latency thresholds, loop detection, and regular dataset updates from tricky production sessions
- Contract Review Assistant With Grounded Answers
- Preferred frameworks: LlamaIndex for RAG-centric operations with citations
- Production add-ons: Faithfulness and citation coverage metrics, human spot checks for last mile accuracy
For detailed playbooks and examples, explore Maxim’s Articles Hub, including reliability patterns and observability guides.
Common Pitfalls And How To Avoid Them
- Overfitting Prompts To Happy Paths
Mitigation: Build representative test suites with adversarial cases. Use simulation to stress prompts under diverse personas and contexts. Start with the Simulations Overview. - Unbounded Tool Calls And Cost Spikes
Mitigation: Enforce strict budgets and rate limits. Alert on anomalies. See Alerts and Notifications. - Silent Regressions After Prompt Or Model Changes
Mitigation: Version prompts and compare runs before promotion. Test across multiple models and parameters. See Experimentation. - Hallucinations That Pass Casual Review
Mitigation: Use faithfulness and grounding evaluators, plus targeted human review queues triggered by low scores or user thumbs down signals. See Agent Simulation and Evaluation. - Missing Observability At The Node Level
Mitigation: Trace at the function and node level. Monitor session and span metrics. Understand what each reveals about quality with Session-Level vs Node-Level Metrics.
Where Maxim Fits In Your Stack
No matter which framework you choose, you will benefit from a platform that streamlines experimentation, simulation, evaluation, and observability in one place.
- Experiment Faster
A Prompt IDE to compare prompts, models, and tools, and deploy versions without code changes. See Experimentation. - Evaluate Rigorously
Unified machine and human evaluations, prebuilt and custom evaluators, scheduled and on demand. See Agent Simulation and Evaluation. - Observe Deeply
Distributed tracing across LLM calls and traditional services, online evaluations on production data, real-time alerts, and exports. See Agent Observability. - Enterprise Ready
In-VPC deployments, SSO, SOC 2 Type 2, RBAC, and priority support. See Pricing.
If you want to see how teams bring these elements together, explore case studies:
- Clinc: Conversational Banking With Quality Guardrails
- Mindtickle: Structured Evaluation At Scale
- Atomicwork: Enterprise Support With Reliable AI
FAQs
What Is The Best AI Agent Framework In 2025?
There is no universal best. If you need branching control and explicit state, consider LangGraph. For multi-agent collaboration, look at CrewAI or AutoGen. For rapid prototyping on the OpenAI stack, OpenAI Agents is efficient. For RAG-centric reliability, LlamaIndex is a strong choice. Regardless of framework, pair it with robust evaluation and observability via Maxim’s Online Evaluations and Tracing.
What Is The Difference Between Single-Agent And Multi-Agent Frameworks?
Single-agent frameworks typically center on one agent calling tools and retrieving context. Multi-agent frameworks coordinate specialized roles across agents to break down problems. Choose multi-agent approaches when you have distinct roles or require iterative debate. For guidance on measuring each, see Evaluation Workflows for AI Agents.
How Do I Evaluate AI Agent Quality In Production?
Combine Online Evaluations on sampled traffic with automated alerts and targeted human review. Measure faithfulness, task success, and latency, and curate tricky examples into datasets for regression testing. Start with Online Evaluations, Alerts, and the Library Overview.
How Do I Mitigate Vendor Lock In When Using Managed Runtimes?
Abstract model and tool interfaces in your application layer. Use framework-agnostic tracing and evaluation. You can forward OTel compatible data to platforms like New Relic and still run deeper quality checks in Maxim. See Agent Observability.
Can I A/B Test Prompts And Agent Versions In Production?
Yes. Use Maxim’s Experimentation to version prompts, run comparisons across models and parameters, and conduct A/B tests in production with controlled rollouts.
Final Thoughts
Choosing the right agent framework is an architectural decision. LangGraph’s graph model excels at complex flows. CrewAI and AutoGen provide formidable multi-agent collaboration. OpenAI Agents prioritize speed on the OpenAI stack with tradeoffs in portability. LlamaIndex Agents deliver grounded, reliable RAG. The best results come from pairing any of these with a rigorous layer for experimentation, simulation, evaluation, and observability.
If you want a pragmatic way to get from prototype to reliable production agents, explore Maxim’s product docs:
With the right framework and the right reliability stack, you can ship faster with predictable quality in real-world conditions.