Evals

TL;DR Agentic AI systems must be evaluated beyond static benchmarks. Effective assessment spans three layers: system efficiency (latency, tokens, tool usage), session-level outcomes (task success, step completion, trajectory quality, self-aware failures), and node-level precision (tool selection, error rate, tool call accuracy, plan evaluation, step utility). This structure quantifies planning,

Building reliable AI agents requires more than great prompts and powerful models. Teams need a disciplined approach to agent simulation, LLM evaluation, RAG evaluation, voice evaluation, and production-grade observability. This guide compares the top platforms practitioners use today, explains the capabilities that matter, and highlights where each tool is a

Evaluating large language models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multimodal agents is no longer optional, it is essential for ensuring AI quality. AI evals platforms give engineering and product teams a common framework to quantify quality, trace decisions, detect hallucinations, and compare changes before they reach production. This guide explains

Evaluating AI agents is essential for reliability. Real-world interactions expose non-determinism, model updates, and hallucinations, which degrade trust without rigorous checks. A structured evaluation approach (pre-release and in production) helps quantify quality, prevent regressions, and align systems to human preference. Maxim AI provides unified capabilities across offline testing, online evaluations,

TL;DR * RAG systems combine retrieval and generation; evaluation must assess both components. * Retrieval quality hinges on recall, precision, relevance, and timeliness of sources. * Generation quality requires grounding, faithfulness, clarity, and low hallucination rates. * Judge reliability improves with mixed methods: LLM-as-a-judge, programmatic checks, and human review. * Use Maxim’s offline